Jay Carney tries to answer questions
regarding the documents obtained by Judicial Watch (Benghazi 4-7-14, 2014), through a Freedom
of Information Act request. These documents identify that former White House
Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes gave former U.N. Ambassador Susan
Rice the Benghazi talking points which attributed the attack on the Benghazi
compound to a video-inspired protest (Newly Released Documents Show
White House Pushed Video, 2014). Carney tries to say that these talking points
were not about Benghazi. This seems entirely disingenuous. Was this originally an
intentional act to focus attention on an internet video? Is this now an attempt
to spin the released documents that were only released after Judicial Watch
brought a lawsuit against the State Department for failure to comply with a
Freedom of Information Act request back on October 18, 2012?
Figure 1 (Jon Karl vs.
Jay Carney on Benghazi, 2014)
Bibliography
Benghazi 4-7-14. (2014, April 28). Retrieved April 30, 2014, from Judical Watch Document
Archive:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/1919_production-4-17-14/
Jon Karl vs. Jay Carney on Benghazi. (2014, April 30). Retrieved April 30, 2014, from
You Tube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Nszcn0-9eTM
Newly Released Documents Show White House Pushed
Video. (2014, April 30). Retrieved
April 30, 2014, from Political Contrast: http://politicalcontrast.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment