Did Zelenskyy Meet with Democrats Before He Met with Trump? Did They Tell Him "Don’t Sign"?
- Meeting with Democrats: Yes, Zelenskyy met with a bipartisan group of U.S. senators, including Democrats, before his White House meeting with Trump on February 28, 2025. ABC News (March 1, 2025) reports that Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), alongside Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and others, held an hour-long meeting with Zelenskyy that morning. Coons described it as an "encouraging" discussion on X, focusing on the U.S.-Ukraine partnership (Coons, 2025). Klobuchar echoed this, noting "strong bipartisan support" (Klobuchar, 2025). The Fox News transcript (March 2, 2025) indirectly supports this, with host Lawrence Jones stating, “He has this congressional meet-up,” though it doesn’t specify Democrats alone (Fox News, 2025b). The Forbes Breaking News transcript with Rubio (March 1, 2025) implies broader pre-meeting engagement, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio noting, “The Ukrainians have met with… the vice president… over the last 10 days” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 8:03-8:06). The Fox Business transcript (March 2, 2025) doesn’t directly address this meeting but frames the Oval Office clash as a backdrop (Fox Business, 2025, 0:24-0:50). The CNN transcript (March 1, 2025) doesn’t mention the Senate meeting explicitly but provides the full Oval Office exchange (CNN, 2025). The Forbes Breaking News transcript with Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (March 1, 2025) doesn’t reference this meeting but critiques the Oval Office event from a Democratic perspective, suggesting Zelenskyy’s stance aligns with broader Democratic support (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b).
- Advice to "Don’t Sign": There’s no definitive, direct evidence from primary sources (e.g., meeting transcripts or official statements) that Democrats explicitly told Zelenskyy "don’t sign" the minerals deal. However, indirect evidence and speculation from secondary sources, X posts, and the video transcripts suggest possible influence:
- X Sentiment: Posts like @marie_ide80526 (March 1, 2025) claim "Democrats were trying to get Zelinsky not to sign the deal," citing Graham’s post-meeting remarks. @RussellSWard (March 2, 2025) references Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) implying Democrats advised Zelenskyy to "hold out for security guarantees," potentially discouraging an immediate signing.
- Media Hints: CNN (March 1, 2025) notes efforts to prepare Zelenskyy focused on the minerals deal but doesn’t attribute "don’t sign" to Democrats specifically (CNN, 2025). PBS News (March 1, 2025) quotes Democrats like Sen. Richard Blumenthal hoping talks wouldn’t derail support, suggesting a preference for stronger terms (PBS News, 2025). The CNN transcript’s commentary by Kaitlan Collins mentions “40 minutes that happened before” the filmed clash (CNN, 2025, 8:32-8:36), where Zelenskyy pressed guarantees and called Putin a “killer” (CNN, 2025, 8:51-8:52), but doesn’t link this to Democrat advice.
- Fox News Transcript: Madeleine Rivera reports, “Obviously Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was told, reportedly by some of his advisers about how to approach the president here. And clearly he did not follow that suggested approach” (Fox News, 2025b, 2:58-3:06). This doesn’t specify Democrats but hints at advice—possibly from the Senate meeting—that Zelenskyy ignored. Brian Kilmeade adds, “He wouldn’t have shown up if he wasn’t going to sign the deal… All the pressure would have been on Russia” (Fox News, 2025b, 3:20-4:17), implying external influence shifted his stance, though not explicitly tied to Democrats.
- Forbes Breaking News Transcript (Rubio): Marco Rubio states, “For the last 10 days in every engagement we’ve had with the Ukrainians there’s been complications in getting that point across… including the public statements that President Zelenskyy has made” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 1:04-1:10). Rubio doesn’t name Democrats but suggests broader U.S. frustration, possibly including the Senate meeting. He notes, “There should have been a very clear understanding don’t come here and… start lecturing us about how diplomacy isn’t going to work” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 1:19-1:25), hinting at pre-meeting advice Zelenskyy defied, though not explicitly "don’t sign."
- Fox Business Transcript: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, when asked by Maria Bartiromo, “Do you believe Democrats were egging on Zelenskyy to not sign that rare earth minerals deal?” responds, “No… I can’t imagine that. Gosh, I hope not. That would be dreadful” (Fox Business, 2025, 2:25-4:00). This directly counters the notion of Democratic interference, emphasizing Trump’s peace intent and Zelenskyy’s rigid demands (“no concessions… $300 billion… security guarantees”) as the clash’s cause (Fox Business, 2025, 2:39-2:49).
- CNN Transcript: The full Oval Office exchange shows Zelenskyy challenging Vance’s diplomacy pitch—“What kind of diplomacy…?” (CNN, 2025, 2:11-2:15)—and pressing his case with historical grievances (CNN, 2025, 0:38-2:09). Collins notes “40 minutes before” where Zelenskyy sought guarantees (CNN, 2025, 8:32-8:36), but there’s no indication this stemmed from Democrats—his stance mirrors pre-meeting rhetoric (Horton, 2025).
- Forbes Breaking News Transcript (Jackson Lee): Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) critiques the Oval Office clash as a “shameful display of bully diplomacy” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b, 0:15-0:18), arguing Zelenskyy shouldn’t need Trump to surrender or concede (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b, 0:50-1:28). She doesn’t mention the Senate meeting or pre-meeting advice but frames Trump’s approach as pressuring Ukraine to cede land and security (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b, 1:47-2:09), suggesting Democratic opposition to such terms—though not explicitly "don’t sign."
- Critical Gap: No verbatim quote from Coons, Klobuchar, or others in the meeting confirms "don’t sign." Fox News’ adviser claim is vague—could include Ukrainian aides (Fox News, 2025b). Rubio suggests U.S. officials expected compliance (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a), but Lutnick’s dismissal (Fox Business, 2025) and CNN’s silence (CNN, 2025) undercut Democrat-specific influence. Jackson Lee’s critique (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b) reflects Democratic sentiment but doesn’t address pre-meeting talks. X posts are anecdotal (@RussellSWard, 2025).
- Assessment: Zelenskyy met with Democrats as part of a bipartisan Senate group—yes. Did they say “don’t sign”? Not explicitly proven—likely encouraged guarantees (NPR, February 26, 2025; CNN, 2025), implying hesitation (@RussellSWard, 2025), but Lutnick’s “I can’t imagine that” (Fox Business, 2025, 3:50-3:59), CNN’s focus on Zelenskyy’s initiative (CNN, 2025), and Jackson Lee’s post-event critique (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b) suggest his stance was self-driven, not Democrat-directed. Evidence remains circumstantial, with Lutnick’s rebuttal casting significant doubt.
Did Zelenskyy Meet with Lindsey Graham Before He Met with Trump? Did Graham Advise Him to Act Tough and Not Sign the Deal?
- Meeting with Lindsey Graham: Yes, Zelenskyy met with Sen. Lindsey Graham before the Trump meeting. ABC News (March 1, 2025) confirms Graham was part of the bipartisan Senate group that morning, alongside Coons and Klobuchar (ABC News, 2025). Graham told The New York Times (March 1, 2025) he spoke with Zelenskyy hours before, aboard Air Force One later that day (NY Times, 2025). The Fox News transcript reinforces this—Lawrence Jones states, “Lindsey Graham… says don’t blow up… be grateful, be thankful… He goes there… and does the exact opposite” (Fox News, 2025b, 5:39-6:01), placing Graham’s advice before the clash. The Forbes Breaking News (Rubio), Fox Business, and CNN transcripts don’t address this meeting directly (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a; Fox Business, 2025; CNN, 2025), while the Forbes Breaking News (Jackson Lee) transcript doesn’t mention it (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b).
- Graham’s Advice: Graham’s pre-meeting advice is documented and contradicts "act tough and not sign":
- Direct Quotes: The New York Times (March 1, 2025) reports Graham saying, “Don’t take the bait… I said, don’t get into arguments about security agreements” (NY Times, 2025). CNN (March 1, 2025) echoes, “Don’t let the media or anyone else get you into an argument with President Trump” (CNN, 2025). The Fox News transcript aligns—Jones notes, “Lindsey Graham… says don’t blow up… be grateful, be thankful, do it this way” (Fox News, 2025b, 5:52-5:55), and Steve Doocy adds, “Don’t take the bait” (Fox News, 2025b, 3:19). India Today (March 2, 2025) supports this: “What he’s doing today is resetting the relationship” (India Today, 2025). The other transcripts don’t cite Graham’s advice directly (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a; Fox Business, 2025; CNN, 2025; Forbes Breaking News, 2025b).
- Interpretation: Graham advised restraint—avoid confrontation, focus on the minerals deal—not toughness or refusal. X posts like @marie_ide80526 (March 1, 2025) claim Graham blamed Democrats post-meeting, not that he urged toughness pre-meeting. The video transcripts reinforce this—Zelenskyy’s defiance (CNN, 2025, 2:11-2:15) went against Graham’s counsel (Fox News, 2025b, 5:39-5:55).
- Post-Meeting Shift: After the clash, Graham called it a “complete, utter disaster” and suggested Zelenskyy resign (Fox News, March 1, 2025; NY Post, February 28, 2025; Fox News, 2025b, 1:30-1:38). Rubio references this in Forbes, noting, “Senator Lindsey Graham… said Zelenskyy either needs to resign…” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 13:35-13:38), but clarifies Trump’s stance as “let him come back when he’s ready to do peace” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 13:56-13:59)—a post-meeting reaction, not pre-meeting advice.
- Assessment: Zelenskyy met Graham—yes. Did Graham advise “act tough and not sign”? No—Graham urged restraint (NY Times, 2025; Fox News, 2025b, 5:39-5:55)—post-meeting critique (Fox News, 2025) doesn’t rewrite this. The “tough” narrative might stem from misreading Graham’s later outrage (Fox News, 2025) or conflating it with Zelenskyy’s actions (CBS News, 2025c; CNN, 2025*).
Critical Synthesis
- Zelenskyy’s Pre-Meeting Actions: He met a bipartisan Senate group, including Democrats (Coons, Klobuchar) and Graham, on February 28, 2025, morning (ABC News, 2025; Fox News, 2025b*). Rubio’s Forbes comments—“The Ukrainians have met with… the vice president… over the last 10 days” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 8:03-8:06)—and Lutnick’s “beautiful lunch arranged” (Fox Business, 2025, 4:08-4:10) suggest broader engagement, possibly with administration figures. The CNN transcript’s “40 minutes before” (CNN, 2025, 8:32-8:36) indicates pre-clash talks where Zelenskyy pressed guarantees, but doesn’t tie this to specific pre-meeting interactions (CNN, 2025).
- Democrats’ Influence: Likely pushed for security guarantees (Horton, 2025), consistent with Zelenskyy’s stance (Balmforth et al., 2025; CNN, 2025, 7:28-7:41), but no hard proof they said “don’t sign” (PBS News, 2025*). Fox News hints at ignored advice (Fox News, 2025b, 3:01-3:06)—possibly from senators—but Lutnick’s “I can’t imagine that” (Fox Business, 2025, 3:50-3:59), CNN’s focus on Zelenskyy’s initiative (CNN, 2025), and Jackson Lee’s critique of Trump’s approach (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b, 0:15-7:35) suggest his actions were self-driven, not Democrat-directed (@RussellSWard, 2025).
- Graham’s Role: Advised de-escalation, not defiance (CNN, 2025; Fox News, 2025b, 5:39-5:55)—his post-meeting “resign” call (Fox News, 2025; Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 13:35-13:38) reflects reaction, not pre-meeting intent (India Today, 2025; Fox Business, 2025 indirectly).
- Meeting Impact: Zelenskyy’s “What kind of diplomacy…?” (CBS News, 2025c; CNN, 2025, 2:11-2:15*) aligns with guarantee demands, possibly shaped by Senate talks, but defied Graham’s caution, sparking Trump/Vance’s backlash (Axios, February 28, 2025; Fox Business, 2025, 0:24-0:50). Rivera’s “he did not follow…” (Fox News, 2025b, 3:03-3:06), Rubio’s “deliberately appear to be geared…” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025a, 4:44-4:49), and Collins’ “devolved when…” (CNN, 2025, 7:18-7:28) underscore this escalation, with Jackson Lee framing it as “bully diplomacy” (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b, 0:15-0:18).
Conclusion
While Zelenskyy did meet with Democrats and others, there is no publicly available evidence proving that anyone said “don’t sign.” It is likely that some encouraged Zelenskyy to request guarantees (NPR, February 26, 2025; CNN, 2025b), implying hesitation (@RussellSWard, 2025), but Lutnick’s denial (Fox Business, 2025, 3:50-3:59), CNN’s focus (CNN, 2025b), and Jackson Lee’s critique (Forbes Breaking News, 2025b) suggest his stance was self-driven, not Democrat-directed.
Zelenskyy also met with Lindsey Graham. However, according to publicly available records, Graham did not advise Zelenskyy to “act tough and not sign.” Graham urged restraint (NY Times, 2025; Fox News, 2025b, 5:39-5:55) and told Zelenskyy, "don’t get into arguments about security agreements."
The clash reflects misaligned expectations as stated in the article "February 28, 2025, White House Oval Office Meeting Analysis" (Political Contrast, 2025)—Trump/Vance expected a deal (Thomas, 2025a), Zelenskyy pressed for more (CBS News, 2025c; CNN, 2025b), possibly influenced by Senate talks but not clearly directed to defy by Democrats or others. Sources, while limited in scope (e.g., lack of primary transcripts), lean towards Zelenskyy acting of his own accord.
No comments:
Post a Comment